[S1M-3351.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 5 Sep 2002 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S1M-3351.2
The description in the bulletin on 2002-09-05 is:
*S1M-3351.2 Irene McGugan: Throughcare and Aftercare of Looked After Children-As an amendment to motion (S1M-3351) in the name of Cathy Jamieson, leave out from "believes" to end and insert "urges the Executive to endorse the recommendations highlighted in the report and to ensure their adequate resourcing and effective implementation."
You can search for this motion (S1M-3351.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The fourth question is, that amendment S1M-3351.2, in the name of Irene McGugan, which seeks to amend motion S1M-3351, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on the throughcare and aftercare of looked-after children, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 13 | 0 | 68.4% |
Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 33.3% |
Lab | 48 | 0 | 0 | 87.3% |
LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SNP | 0 | 27 | 0 | 81.8% |
SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 64 | 42 | 0 | 83.5% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by vote
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |