Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Bill — 31 Oct 2002 at 22:37
Resolved in the negative, and amendment disagreed to accordingly.
[Amendments 89 and 90 not moved].
moved Amendment No. 91:
Page 52, line 29, at end insert-
"(2A) If the Secretary of State certifies under subsection (2) that a claim is clearly unfounded, the person who made the claim may, with the permission of the Immigration Appeal Tribunal, appeal to the Tribunal against the certificate.
(2B) A party to an appeal to the Tribunal under subsection (2A) may apply to the High Court, or in Scotland to the Court of Session, for a review of the Tribunal's decision on the ground that the Tribunal made an error of law.
(2C) Where an application is made under subsection (2B)-
(a) it shall be determined by a single judge by reference only to written submissions,
(b) the judge may affirm or reverse the Tribunal's decision, and
(c) the judge's decision shall be final."
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 91) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 46; Not-Contents, 71.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Not-Content) | Minority (Content) | Turnout |
| Bishop | 0 | 2 | 8.7% |
| Con | 0 | 4 | 1.8% |
| Crossbench | 0 | 4 | 2.3% |
| Lab | 69 (+2 tell) | 4 | 38.5% |
| LDem | 0 | 30 (+2 tell) | 48.5% |
| Total: | 69 | 44 | 17.3% |
All lords Eligible to Vote - sorted by vote
Includes lords who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.