[S1M-3748.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 9 Jan 2003 at 17:04
This looks like the vote on S1M-3748.1
The description in the bulletin on 2003-01-09 is:
*S1M-3748.1 Bill Aitken: Review of Child Protection-As an amendment to motion (S1M-3748) in the name of Cathy Jamieson, leave out from "and supports" to end and insert "calls for an overhaul of the children's hearing system which would not only better deal with young offenders, but offer greater protection to vulnerable young Scots, and further calls for a substantial increase in the number of police officers visible within our communities to deter and detect crime which would help make all sections of society safer."
You can search for this motion (S1M-3748.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The fifth question is, that amendment S1M-3748.1, in the name of Bill Aitken, which seeks to amend motion S1M-3748, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on the review of child protection, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 18 | 0 | 94.7% |
Green | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 2 | 0 | 0 | 66.7% |
Lab | 51 | 0 | 0 | 92.7% |
LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 93.8% |
SNP | 28 | 0 | 0 | 84.8% |
SSP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 98 | 18 | 0 | 90.6% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by name
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |