[S1M-3680] Decision Time — 13 Feb 2003 at 17:02
This looks like the vote on S1M-3680
The description in the bulletin on 2002-12-05 is:
*S1M-3680 Colin Boyd QC: Salmon and Freshwater Fisheries (Consolidation) (Scotland) Bill-That the Parliament agrees that the law which is restated in the Salmon and Freshwater Fisheries (Consolidation) (Scotland) Bill should be restated. Supported by: Mrs Elish Angiolini*
The description in the bulletin on 2002-12-09 is:
S1M-3680 Colin Boyd QC: Salmon and Freshwater Fisheries (Consolidation) (Scotland) Bill-That the Parliament agrees that the law which is restated in the Salmon and Freshwater Fisheries (Consolidation) (Scotland) Bill should be restated. Supported by: Mrs Elish Angiolini
The description in the bulletin on 2003-02-10 is:
S1M-3680 Colin Boyd QC: Salmon and Freshwater Fisheries (Consolidation) (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament agrees that the law which is restated in the Salmon and Freshwater Fisheries (Consolidation) (Scotland) Bill should be restated.Supported by: Mrs Elish Angiolini
You can search for this motion (S1M-3680) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The fourth question is, that motion S1M-3680, in the name of Colin Boyd, on the Salmon and Freshwater Fisheries (Consolidation) (Scotland) Bill, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 11 | 0 | 0 | 57.9% |
| Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Lab | 44 | 1 | 0 | 81.8% |
| LDem | 14 | 0 | 0 | 87.5% |
| SNP | 25 | 0 | 1 | 78.8% |
| Total: | 94 | 3 | 1 | 77.2% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by constituency
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote