[S1M-3959.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 5 Mar 2003 at 16:43
This looks like the vote on S1M-3959.1
The description in the bulletin on 2003-03-05 is:
*S1M-3959.1 Richard Lochhead: The Sea Fishing (Transitional Support) (Scotland) (No.2) Scheme 2003-As an amendment to motion (S1M-3959) in the name of Ross Finnie, insert at end "but, in doing so, supports the views of the fishing industry, fishing communities and the Rural Development Committee that the overwhelming emphasis of any Scottish Executive aid package should be on transitional aid for the fleet and onshore sectors rather than the decommissioning of vessels, and urges ministers to respond positively to the proposals by industry representatives on how this can be best achieved." Supported by: Stewart Stevenson*
You can search for this motion (S1M-3959.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The third question is, that amendment S1M-3959.1, in the name of Richard Lochhead, which seeks to amend motion S1M-3959, in the name of Ross Finnie, on the Sea Fishing (Transitional Support) (Scotland) (No 2) Scheme 2003 (SSI 2003/116), be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 14 | 0 | 73.7% |
| Green | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Lab | 48 | 0 | 0 | 87.3% |
| LDem | 14 | 0 | 0 | 87.5% |
| SNP | 0 | 28 | 0 | 84.8% |
| SSP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 62 | 45 | 1 | 84.4% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by constituency
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||