Planning and Compulsory Purchase Bill (ReCommittal) — 10 Jun 2003 at 16:12
Andrew Mitchell MP, Sutton Coldfield voted in the minority (No).
I beg to move,
That the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Bill be re-committed to a Standing Committee.
Question put, pursuant to Standing Order No. 74 (Re-committal of bill):-
The House divided: Ayes 285, Noes 168.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Both | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 122 (+2 tell) | 0 | 76.1% |
DUP | 0 | 2 | 0 | 40.0% |
Independent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent Conservative | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 283 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 69.5% |
LDem | 0 | 33 | 0 | 62.3% |
PC | 0 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% |
SNP | 0 | 4 | 0 | 80.0% |
UUP | 1 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
Total: | 285 | 168 | 0 | 70.5% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
Sylvia Hermon | North Down | UUP (front bench) | aye |