[S2M-126.1 (Amendment)] Parliamentary Bureau Motions — 11 Jun 2003 at 14:45
This looks like the vote on S2M-126.1
The description in the bulletin on 2003-06-11 is:
*S2M-126.1 Bill Aitken: Business Motion—As an amendment to motion (S2M-126) in the name of Patricia Ferguson, after— "followed by Final Stage of the Robin Rigg Offshore Wind Farm (Navigation and Fishing) (Scotland) Bill" insert— "Thursday 12 June 2003 delete— "3:30 pm Executive Debate on Investing in Public Transport" and insert— "3:30 pm Statement by the Presiding Officer on Increased Costs of the Holyrood Building Project 4:00 pm Statement by the First Minister on Inquiry into the Holyrood Building Project."" Supported by: David McLetchie*, Mr David Davidson*, Margaret Mitchell*, Mr Ted Brocklebank*, Lord James Douglas-Hamilton*, Alex Fergusson*, David Mundell*, Mrs Nanette Milne*, Alex Johnstone*, Mr Jamie McGrigor*
You can search for this motion (S2M-126.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The question is, that amendment S2M-126.1, in the name of Bill Aitken, which seeks to amend motion S2M-126, in the name of Patricia Ferguson, on Parliamentary business, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 13 | 1 | 77.8% |
| Green | 4 | 0 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Lab | 50 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 88.2% |
| SNP | 0 | 25 | 0 | 96.2% |
| SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Total: | 70 | 44 | 1 | 89.8% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by name
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
| Murray Tosh | West of Scotland | Con | abstention |