[S2M-161.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 19 Jun 2003 at 16:58
This looks like the vote on S2M-161.3
The description in the bulletin on 2003-06-19 is:
*S2M-161.3 John Swinburne: Care Homes for the Elderly-As an amendment to motion (S2M-161) in the name of Mr David Davidson, leave out from "there is" to end and insert "means testing discriminates against residents who have made provision for their long-term care and calls on the Executive to provide long-term care for the elderly without such discrimination".
You can search for this motion (S2M-161.3) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
In that case, amendment S2M-161.1, in the name of Stewart Stevenson, and amendment S2M-161.3, in the name of John Swinburne, are pre-empted. Therefore, the next question is, that motion S2M-161, in the name of David Davidson, on care homes for the elderly, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 15 | 0 | 83.3% |
Green | 0 | 6 | 0 | 85.7% |
Independent | 1 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
Lab | 46 | 0 | 0 | 92.0% |
LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 88.2% |
SNP | 0 | 23 | 0 | 88.5% |
SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SSP | 0 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
Total: | 63 | 47 | 1 | 86.7% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote