Local Government Bill (Programme) (No. 4) — 15 Sep 2003 at 15:32
Oliver Letwin MP, West Dorset voted in the minority (No).
Motion made, and Question put forthwith, pursuant to Orders (28 June 2001 and 29 October 2002).
That the following provisions shall apply to the Local Government Bill for the purpose of supplementing the Orders of 7th January 2003, 28th January 2003 and 25th February 2003:
Consideration of Lords Amendments
1. Proceedings on consideration of Lords Amendments shall (so far as not previously concluded) be brought to a conclusion at the moment of interruption at this day's sitting.
2. Those proceedings shall be taken in the order shown in the first column of the following Table, and each part of those proceedings shall (so far as not previously concluded) be brought to a conclusion at the time shown in the second column.
3. Any further Message from the Lords may be considered forthwith without any Question put.
4. The proceedings on any further Message from the Lords shall (so far as not previously concluded) be brought to a conclusion one hour after their commencement.-<[i>Mr. Raynsford.]
The House divided: Ayes 237, Noes 140.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||0||108 (+2 tell)||0||67.5%|
|Independent Ulster Unionist||0||1||0||33.3%|
|Lab||237 (+2 tell)||0||0||58.4%|