Criminal Justice Bill — 29 Oct 2003 at 18:55
Baroness Kennedy of The Shaws voted with the majority (Content).
Clause 9 [Taking non-intimate samples without consent]:
[Amendments Nos. 13 and 14 not moved.]
moved Amendment No. 15:
After Clause 9, insert the following new clause-
"DESTRUCTION OF FINGERPRINTS AND SAMPLES
(1) Section 64 of the 1984 Act (destruction of fingerprints and samples) is amended as follows.
(2) In subsection (3), the words ", except as provided in the following provisions of this section," are omitted.
(3) Subsections (3AA), (3AB) and (3AC) are omitted."
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 15) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 103; Not-Contents, 101.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Content)||Minority (Not-Content)||Turnout|
|Con||46 (+1 tell)||0||22.3%|
|Lab||2||93 (+2 tell)||52.2%|
|LDem||41 (+1 tell)||0||65.6%|
|Viscount Brookeborough||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Craig of Radley||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Baroness Masham of Ilton||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Walpole||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Williamson of Horton||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Baroness Kennedy of The Shaws||Lab||aye|
|Lord Wedderburn of Charlton||Lab||aye|