[S2M-543.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 20 Nov 2003 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S2M-543.1
The description in the bulletin on 2003-11-20 is:
*S2M-543.1 Patrick Harvie: UK Legislation - Planning and Compulsory Purchase Bill-As an amendment to motion (S2M-543) in the name of Ms Margaret Curran, insert at end "but, in so doing, expresses its concerns over several provisions contained in the Bill, namely those relating to national security, urgency and enforcement; believes that these provisions could face objectors with a greater disadvantage in Crown planning cases than they are faced with in private planning cases, and considers that the UK Parliament should address these issues during its consideration of the Bill."
You can search for this motion (S2M-543.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S2M-543.1, in the name of Patrick Harvie, which seeks to amend motion S2M-543, in the name of Margaret Curran, on the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Bill, which is UK legislation, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 17 | 0 | 0 | 94.4% |
Green | 0 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 1 | 1 | 66.7% |
Lab | 47 | 0 | 0 | 94.0% |
LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
SNP | 0 | 22 | 0 | 84.6% |
SSP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 83.3% |
Total: | 80 | 35 | 1 | 91.3% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by vote
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |