[S2M-685] Decision Time — 3 Dec 2003 at 17:06
This looks like the vote on S2M-685
The description in the bulletin on 2003-12-02 is:
*S2M-685 Cathy Jamieson: Modernising Access to Legal Advice, Information and Representation-That the Parliament notes the progress made to date on modernising access to legal advice, information and representation; agrees the importance of increasing access to justice through a better and more consistent provision of legal information and advice throughout Scotland, and welcomes the strategic review of the delivery of legal aid, advice and information as a means of ensuring a better and more efficient public service in line with the needs of Scottish citizens. Supported by: Hugh Henry*
You can search for this motion (S2M-685) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The third question is, that motion S2M-685, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on modernising access to legal advice, information and representation, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 11 | 0 | 0 | 61.1% |
Green | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% |
Lab | 49 | 0 | 0 | 98.0% |
LDem | 14 | 0 | 0 | 82.4% |
SNP | 0 | 0 | 23 | 88.5% |
SSCUP | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
SSP | 4 | 0 | 0 | 66.7% |
Total: | 86 | 0 | 24 | 85.9% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by vote
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |