[S2M-718.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 11 Dec 2003 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S2M-718.3
The description in the bulletin on 2003-12-11 is:
*S2M-718.3 Peter Peacock: Reform of Public Services-As an amendment to motion (S2M-718) in the name of David McLetchie, leave out from "acknowledges" to end and insert "supports the radical, demanding and relevant agenda set out in A Partnership for a Better Scotland including the delivery of excellent public services that put patients, pupils and victims first, ensure equality of access across urban and rural Scotland, devolve decision-making to front-line staff, establish national standards on which local excellence can be built, backed by inspection, and share best practice and action to tackle and turn around poor performance." Supported by: Malcolm Chisholm*
You can search for this motion (S2M-718.3) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that amendment S2M-718.3, in the name of Peter Peacock, which seeks to amend motion S2M-718, in the name of David McLetchie, on reform of public services, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 15 | 0 | 83.3% |
Green | 0 | 6 | 0 | 85.7% |
Independent | 1 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
Lab | 48 | 0 | 0 | 96.0% |
LDem | 14 | 0 | 0 | 82.4% |
SNP | 0 | 22 | 0 | 84.6% |
SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SSP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 83.3% |
Total: | 64 | 48 | 1 | 88.3% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote