[S2M-1090.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 25 Mar 2004 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S2M-1090.1
The description in the bulletin on 2004-03-25 is:
*S2M-1090.1 Michael Matheson: Protecting Communities - Reforming the Role of Non-Jury Courts-As an amendment to motion (S2M-1090) in the name of Cathy Jamieson, leave out from "considers" to end and insert "supports the need to have a fair, effective and efficient summary criminal justice system; welcomes the recent report by Sheriff Principal McInnes; acknowledges the note of dissent within the report, and believes that future changes to the summary justice system must impart confidence to everyone: victims, witnesses, accused persons, court users and, above all, the communities they serve.
You can search for this motion (S2M-1090.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The sixth question is, that amendment S2M-1090.1, in the name of Michael Matheson, which seeks to amend motion S2M-1090, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on protecting communities and reforming the role of non-jury courts, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
All Votes Cast - sorted by vote
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party are marked in red. Also shows which MPs were ministers at the time of this vote. You can also see every eligible MP including those who did not vote in this division.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote