[S2M-1184.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 22 Apr 2004 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S2M-1184.1
The description in the bulletin on 2004-04-22 is:
*S2M-1184.1 Stewart Stevenson: Mental Health-As an amendment to motion (S2M-1184) in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, insert at end "while expressing concern that the large number of vacant consultant psychiatrists' posts represents a significant barrier to delivering much sought after improvements." Supported by: Shona Robison*
You can search for this motion (S2M-1184.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
There are eight questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that amendment S2M-1184.1, in the name of Stewart Stevenson, which seeks to amend motion S2M-1184, in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, on mental health, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 15 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Green | 0 | 6 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Lab | 46 | 0 | 0 | 92.0% |
| LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 88.2% |
| SNP | 0 | 26 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSCUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Total: | 61 | 54 | 0 | 89.8% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by name
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||