[S2M-1100] Decision Time — 28 Apr 2004 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S2M-1100
The description in the bulletin on 2004-03-26 is:
*S2M-1100 Cathy Jamieson: Criminal Procedure (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill-That the Parliament agrees that the Criminal Procedure (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Hugh Henry*
The description in the bulletin on 2004-03-29 is:
S2M-1100 Cathy Jamieson: Criminal Procedure (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill-That the Parliament agrees that the Criminal Procedure (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Hugh Henry
The description in the bulletin on 2004-04-26 is:
S2M-1100 Cathy Jamieson: Criminal Procedure (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill-That the Parliament agrees that the Criminal Procedure (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Hugh Henry
You can search for this motion (S2M-1100) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
There are five questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that motion S2M-1100, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, that the Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Scotland Bill be passed, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 13 | 0 | 0 | 72.2% |
| Green | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Lab | 49 | 0 | 0 | 98.0% |
| LDem | 17 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 24 | 0 | 0 | 92.3% |
| SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 0 | 5 | 83.3% |
| Total: | 112 | 0 | 5 | 91.4% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by name
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||