Planning and Compulsory Purchase Bill — New Clause — Application of Part 1 — 29 Apr 2004 at 14:50
Mr Andrew Hunter MP, Basingstoke voted in the minority (No).
Question accordingly agreed to.
Lords amendment disagreed to.
Government amendment (a) in lieu of Lords amendment No. 1 agreed to.
Lords Reason: No. 3B
The Lords insist on their Amendment 3 to which the Commons have disagreed, for the following Reason-
Because regional spatial strategies should be based on the views of local communities
Motion made, and Question put, That this House insists on its disagreement with the Lords in the said amendment.-[Keith Hill.]
The House divided: Ayes 235, Noes 141.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Both | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 99 (+2 tell) | 0 | 62.0% |
DUP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 83.3% |
Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
Independent Conservative | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 235 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 58.1% |
LDem | 0 | 32 | 0 | 59.3% |
PC | 0 | 1 | 0 | 25.0% |
UUP | 0 | 2 | 0 | 40.0% |
Total: | 235 | 141 | 0 | 59.1% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |