[S2M-1219.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 29 Apr 2004 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S2M-1219.1
The description in the bulletin on 2004-04-29 is:
*S2M-1219.1 Nicola Sturgeon: Reducing Reoffending - Improving the Effectiveness of Custodial and Non-Custodial Sentences-As an amendment to motion (S2M-1219) in the name of Cathy Jamieson, insert at end "but is, as yet, not persuaded of the case for a single national correctional agency."
You can search for this motion (S2M-1219.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S2M-1219.1, in the name of Nicola Sturgeon, which seeks to amend motion S2M-1219, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on reducing reoffending and improving the effectiveness of custodial and non-custodial sentences, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 15 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Green | 0 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 1 | 2 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 48 | 0 | 0 | 96.0% |
| LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
| SNP | 0 | 23 | 0 | 88.5% |
| SSCUP | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Total: | 64 | 51 | 3 | 92.2% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by name
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||