[S2M-1882.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 27 Oct 2004 at 17:06
This looks like the vote on S2M-1882.2
The description in the bulletin on 2004-10-27 is:
*S2M-1882.2 Miss Annabel Goldie: Tackling Drugs Misuse: Protecting Scotland’s Communities—As an amendment to motion (S2M-1882) in the name of Cathy Jamieson, leave out from "commends" to end and insert "deplores the escalating drugs abuse problem in Scotland and the implicit reliance on methadone harm reduction programmes and calls for a radical change in policy to reduce demand for drugs by providing a route to abstinence and taking more effective action to cut the supply of drugs."
You can search for this motion (S2M-1882.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S2M-1882.2, in the name of Annabel Goldie, which seeks to amend motion S2M-1882, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on tackling drugs misuse and protecting Scotland's communities, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 18 | 0 | 100.0% |
Green | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 25.0% |
Lab | 47 | 0 | 0 | 94.0% |
LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 88.2% |
SNP | 25 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SSP | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 100 | 19 | 0 | 93.7% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by constituency
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |