Categories of civil partners other than same sex couples — 9 Nov 2004 at 17:00
Peter Ainsworth MP, East Surrey voted with the majority (No).
I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.
The clause in question is as follows.
'(1) Two siblings, both of whom are aged over thirty years, shall be eligible to register as civil partners provided that they have lived together for a continuous period of twelve years immediately prior to the date of registration.
(2) In this section "sibling" means a brother, sister, half-brother or half-sister.
(3) Chapter 2 of Part 2, Chapter 5 of Part 3 and Chapter 2 of Part 4 shall not apply to civil partnerships formed by virtue of this section.
(4) Section [Termination of civil partnerships other than same sex couples] shall apply to civil partnerships formed by virtue of this section.'.—[Mr. Leigh.]
Question put, That the clause be read a Second time:-
The Civil Partnership Bill sought to give homosexual couples the equivalent rights to those of married couples. This clause sought to additionally give those rights to brothers and sisters who were living together. Those voting Aye in this division were voting for the clause.
The House divided: Ayes 74, Noes 381.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||34||61 (+2 tell)||0||59.5%|
|Lab||300 (+2 tell)||2||0||74.7%|