Civil Contingencies Bill (Programme) (No. 2) — 17 Nov 2004 at 12:37
Oliver Letwin MP, West Dorset voted in the minority (No).
Motion made, and Question put forthwith, pursuant to Orders [28 June 2001 and 6 November 2003],
That the following proceedings shall apply to the Civil Contingencies Bill for the purpose of supplementing the Order of 19th January 2004.
Consideration of Lords Amendments
1. Proceedings on consideration of Lords Amendments shall (so far as not previously concluded) be brought to a conclusion three hours after their commencement at this day's sitting.
2. Those proceedings shall be taken in the order shown in the first column of the following table, and each part of those proceedings shall (so far as not previously concluded) be brought to a conclusion at the time shown in the second column.
3. Any further Message from the Lords may be considered forthwith without any further Question being put.
4. The proceedings on any further Message from the Lords shall (so far as not previously concluded) be brought to a conclusion one hour after their commencement-<[i>Paul Clark.]
The House divided: Ayes 277, Noes 174.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||0||115 (+2 tell)||0||71.8%|
|Lab||275 (+2 tell)||0||0||68.1%|