Hunting Bill — reaction to Commons Amendments — 18 Nov 2004 at 18:20
A vote to insist on the previous Lords amendments to the Hunting Bill in place of the Commons amendments for a ban on hunting with dogs.
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 153; Not-Contents, 114.
Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please
consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
| Bishop | 0 | 1 | 3.8% |
| Con | 101 (+1 tell) | 1 | 49.0% |
| Crossbench | 28 | 2 | 16.9% |
| Lab | 11 (+1 tell) | 77 (+2 tell) | 44.4% |
| LDem | 7 | 30 | 53.6% |
| Total: | 147 | 111 | 38.1% |
All lords Eligible to Vote - sorted by name
Includes lords who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.