[S2M-1960] Decision Time — 18 Nov 2004 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S2M-1960
The description in the bulletin on 2004-11-05 is:
*S2M-1960 Cathy Jamieson: The Fire (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament agrees to the general principles of the Fire (Scotland) Bill. Supported by: Hugh Henry*
The description in the bulletin on 2004-11-08 is:
S2M-1960 Cathy Jamieson: The Fire (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament agrees to the general principles of the Fire (Scotland) Bill. Supported by: Hugh Henry
The description in the bulletin on 2004-11-15 is:
S2M-1960 Cathy Jamieson: The Fire (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament agrees to the general principles of the Fire (Scotland) Bill. Supported by: Hugh Henry
You can search for this motion (S2M-1960) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The third question is, that motion S2M-1960, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on the general principles of the Fire (Scotland) Bill, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 14 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Green | 6 | 0 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Independent | 2 | 0 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Lab | 46 | 0 | 0 | 93.9% |
| LDem | 17 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 0 | 0 | 24 | 96.0% |
| SSCUP | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 77 | 14 | 26 | 91.4% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by name
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote