[S2M-2129.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 9 Dec 2004 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S2M-2129.1
The description in the bulletin on 2004-12-09 is:
*S2M-2129.1 Mr Ted Brocklebank: Fisheries—As an amendment to motion (S2M-2129) in the name of Ross Finnie, leave out from "an outcome" to end and insert "urges the Minister for Environment and Rural Development to secure higher quotas and more days at sea to secure a future for our fishermen and their coastal communities, accompanied by an end to the discredited haddock permit scheme with no new restrictions for the nephrops sector, and calls on the Executive to support the view of the vast majority of Scottish fishermen that it is time to end the discredited Common Fisheries Policy and to regain national control of UK waters".
You can search for this motion (S2M-2129.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S2M-2129.1, in the name of Ted Brocklebank, which seeks to amend motion S2M-2129, in the name of Ross Finnie, on fisheries, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 16 | 0 | 88.9% |
| Green | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 3 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Lab | 49 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
| SNP | 0 | 21 | 0 | 84.0% |
| SSCUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 0 | 6 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 75 | 39 | 6 | 93.8% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by vote
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||