[S2M-2119] Decision Time — 19 Jan 2005 at 17:00

This looks like the vote on S2M-2119

The description in the bulletin on 2004-12-07 is:

*S2M-2119 Cathy Jamieson: Constitutional Reform Bill - UK Legislation—That the Parliament agrees the principle of having a clear and transparent separation between the judiciary and the legislature and agrees that provisions in the Constitutional Reform Bill establishing a Supreme Court, and provisions consequential thereto, so far as they relate to matters within the legislative competence of the Parliament, should be considered by the UK Parliament. Supported by: Hugh Henry*

The description in the bulletin on 2004-12-13 is:

S2M-2119 Cathy Jamieson: Constitutional Reform Bill - UK Legislation—That the Parliament agrees the principle of having a clear and transparent separation between the judiciary and the legislature and agrees that provisions in the Constitutional Reform Bill establishing a Supreme Court, and provisions consequential thereto, so far as they relate to matters within the legislative competence of the Parliament, should be considered by the UK Parliament. Supported by: Hugh Henry

The description in the bulletin on 2005-01-17 is:

S2M-2119 Cathy Jamieson: Constitutional Reform Bill - UK Legislation—That the Parliament agrees the principle of having a clear and transparent separation between the judiciary and the legislature and agrees that provisions in the Constitutional Reform Bill establishing a Supreme Court, and provisions consequential thereto, so far as they relate to matters within the legislative competence of the Parliament, should be considered by the UK Parliament. Supported by: Hugh Henry

You can search for this motion (S2M-2119) on TheyWorkForYou

Text Introducing Division:

The fourth question is, that motion S2M-2119, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on the Constitutional Reform Bill, under United Kingdom legislation, be agreed to. Are we agreed?

No.

There will be a division.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |