Constitutional Reform Bill — Clause 2 — Requirement of membership of the House of Lords — 31 Jan 2005 at 21:00
Kate Hoey MP, Vauxhall voted with the majority (No).
Those voting No deleted Clause 2 of the Constitutional Reform Bill, which said:
No person is qualified to be Lord Chancellor unless he is a member of the House of Lords.
The Lord Chancellor's functions are outlined in this Bill
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Both | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 114 (+2 tell) | 0 | 71.6% |
DUP | 0 | 4 | 0 | 57.1% |
Lab | 254 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 62.7% |
LDem | 17 | 0 | 0 | 30.9% |
PC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 25.0% |
UUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 20.0% |
Total: | 272 | 119 | 0 | 61.6% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |