Serious Organised Crime and Police Bill — [1st Allotted Day] — New Clause 6 — Interception of communications — 7 Feb 2005 at 19:00
John Prescott MP, Kingston upon Hull East voted with the majority (No).
At the time of this debate, communications that had been intercepted by law enforcement agencies in the UK could not be presented as evidence in criminal court cases. The clause that was being voted on sought to remove this restriction so that intercepted communications would be admisible as evidence.
The no voters rejected the clause, therefore keeping the law unchanged.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||0||123 (+2 tell)||0||77.6%|
|Lab||284 (+2 tell)||9||0||72.3%|
|Jeremy Corbyn||Islington North||Lab||aye|
|Frank Field||Birkenhead||Lab (minister)||aye|
|Mark Fisher||Stoke-on-Trent Central||Lab (minister)||aye|
|Kate Hoey||Vauxhall||Lab (minister)||aye|
|Glenda Jackson||Hampstead and Highgate||Lab||aye|
|Lynne Jones||Birmingham, Selly Oak||Lab||aye|
|John Martin McDonnell||Hayes and Harlington||Lab||aye|
|Alan Simpson||Nottingham South||Lab (minister)||aye|