Prevention of Terrorism Bill — Insisted Amendment — Privy Council Review — 10 Mar 2005 at 19:00
The Aye-voters "insisted on" the result of their vote the day before in Division 125.
The measures they rejected (for a second time) was a senior review of operation of the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 after eight months that would make recomendations as the process of future legislation. Such a review would be limited in that it could not review the Sunset Clause.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||0||137 (+1 tell)||0||85.7%|
|Lab||326 (+2 tell)||17||1||84.8%|
|LDem||0||51 (+1 tell)||0||94.5%|
|Clare Short||Birmingham, Ladywood||Lab||no|
|Lynne Jones||Birmingham, Selly Oak||Lab||no|
|Mr Andrew Bennett||Denton and Reddish||Lab (minister)||no|
|Diane Abbott||Hackney North and Stoke Newington||Lab||no|
|Mr Brian Sedgemore||Hackney South and Shoreditch||Lab||no|
|Glenda Jackson||Hampstead and Highgate||Lab||no|
|John Martin McDonnell||Hayes and Harlington||Lab||no|
|Jeremy Corbyn||Islington North||Lab||no|
|Mr Tam Dalyell||Linlithgow||Lab||no|
|Peter Kilfoyle||Liverpool, Walton||Lab||no|
|Kelvin Hopkins||Luton North||Lab (minister)||no|
|David Taylor||North West Leicestershire||Lab (minister)||both|
|Ian Gibson||Norwich North||Lab (minister)||no|
|Alan Simpson||Nottingham South||Lab (minister)||no|
|Gordon Prentice||Pendle||Lab (minister)||no|
|Barbara Follett||Stevenage||Lab (minister)||no|
|Kate Hoey||Vauxhall||Lab (minister)||no|