[S2M-3658.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 1 Dec 2005 at 17:02

This looks like the vote on S2M-3658.1

The description in the bulletin on 2005-12-01 is:

*S2M-3658.1 Fiona Hyslop: Ambitious, Excellent Schools: One Year On—As an amendment to motion (S2M-3658) in the name of Peter Peacock, leave out from "the significant progress" to end and insert "that all schools should be Schools of Ambition; notes the objectives set out in Ambitious, Excellent Schools and, in particular, the cultural emphasis of a number of the successful bids for schools of ambition status but, in doing so, notes the general concern that Scotland’s culture, history and heritage lack national support from the Scottish Executive in the education system; notes with serious concern the proposals by the Executive to make history history in S1 and S2; asserts the importance of children in Scotland having a firm understanding and appreciation of Scottish heritage, culture and history; recognises and supports creative ways to weave this into every subject in the curriculum providing a Scottish perspective; rejects, however, any attempt to remove the stand-alone subject of history from S1 and S2 in schools in Scotland, and regrets any suggestion of this by any Scottish minister, reflecting that such a move would not be even countenanced in other countries who have a pride in promoting their nation’s history." Supported by: Mr Adam Ingram*

You can search for this motion (S2M-3658.1) on TheyWorkForYou

Text Introducing Division:

There are eight questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that amendment S2M-3658.1, in the name of Fiona Hyslop, which seeks to amend motion S2M-3658, in the name of Peter Peacock, on "ambitious, excellent schools", one year on, be agreed to. Are we agreed?

No.

There will be a division.

Debate in Parliament | Source |