[S2M-3628] Decision Time — 15 Dec 2005 at 18:31
This looks like the vote on S2M-3628
The description in the bulletin on 2005-11-25 is:
*S2M-3628 Cathy Jamieson: Family Law (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament agrees that the Family Law (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Hugh Henry*
The description in the bulletin on 2005-11-28 is:
S2M-3628 Cathy Jamieson: Family Law (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament agrees that the Family Law (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Hugh Henry
The description in the bulletin on 2005-12-12 is:
S2M-3628 Cathy Jamieson: Family Law (Scotland) Bill—That the Parliament agrees that the Family Law (Scotland) Bill be passed. Supported by: Hugh Henry
You can search for this motion (S2M-3628) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
There are three questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that motion S2M-3628, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, that the Family Law (Scotland) Bill be passed, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 7 | 8 | 2 | 100.0% |
| Green | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 4 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 47 | 0 | 0 | 94.0% |
| LDem | 17 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 17 | 3 | 4 | 96.0% |
| SSP | 5 | 0 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Total: | 104 | 12 | 6 | 96.1% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by constituency
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote