[S2M-3767] Decision Time — 22 Dec 2005 at 14:56
This looks like the vote on S2M-3767
The description in the bulletin on 2005-12-21 is:
*S2M-3767 Carolyn Leckie: Blood Products—That the Parliament recognises the dogged efforts of patients, relatives, campaigners and all those who have highlighted the issues around the contamination of blood products, including those with viruses such as Hepatitis C and HIV, in the past and the serious consequences for the recipients of these products and their families; acknowledges the previous and continuing work of the Parliament’s Health Committee and MSPs; accepts that campaigners’ demands for a full, independent, public inquiry remain outstanding; believes that there is now more information in the public domain and that the debate has moved on, and agrees that there should now be a full, independent public inquiry. Supported by: Colin Fox*
You can search for this motion (S2M-3767) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The amendment in the name of Nanette Milne therefore falls, which takes us to the next question, which is, that motion S2M-3767, in the name of Carolyn Leckie, on blood products, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
All Votes Cast - sorted by constituency
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party are marked in red. Also shows which MPs were ministers at the time of this vote. You can also see every eligible MP including those who did not vote in this division.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote