[S2M-3922.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 8 Feb 2006 at 17:03
This looks like the vote on S2M-3922.2
The description in the bulletin on 2006-02-08 is:
*S2M-3922.2 Mr John Swinney: Local Government Finance (Scotland) Order 2006—As an amendment to motion (S2M-3922) in the name of Mr Tom McCabe, insert at end "but, in so doing, considers that, in order to protect council tax payers from above-inflation increases in council tax that will arise from the inadequate financial provision in this Order, local authorities should be permitted to retain £58.5 million in efficiency savings and obtain a £34.7m share of the public expenditure arising from the pre-Budget report to close the financial gap in support for local authority services that exists." Motions and amendments which have attracted additional support
You can search for this motion (S2M-3922.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that amendment S2M-3922.2, in the name of John Swinney, which seeks to amend motion S2M-3922, in the name of Tom McCabe, on the Local Government Finance (Scotland) Order 2006, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
| Green | 0 | 6 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Independent | 0 | 3 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Lab | 46 | 0 | 0 | 92.0% |
| LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
| SNP | 0 | 18 | 0 | 72.0% |
| SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 0 | 4 | 66.7% |
| Total: | 79 | 27 | 5 | 86.7% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote