[S2M-4367] Decision Time — 11 May 2006 at 16:59
This looks like the vote on S2M-4367
The description in the bulletin on 2006-05-10 is:
*S2M-4367 Jim Mather: Scottish Enterprise—That the Parliament views the current financial position of Scottish Enterprise with mounting concern, given that the overspend is now estimated to be in excess of £60 million; is doubly concerned that this overspend will jeopardise jobs, skills and training, including those jobs of Scottish Enterprise employees; is disturbed to discover that Scottish Executive ministers were unaware of the true extent of the overspend for four months after it was first identified; criticises the failure to address this mismanagement at an earlier stage, and calls for urgent action to be taken to address the current problems facing Scottish Enterprise, for future guarantees that organisations must live within their established budgets and a recognition that the activity of enterprise agencies will never adequately compensate the people of Scotland for the lack of economic powers and the full means to manage the Scottish economy competitively and effectively in the interest of everyone in Scotland.
You can search for this motion (S2M-4367) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that motion S2M-4367, in the name of Jim Mather, on Scottish Enterprise, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 16 | 0 | 94.1% |
| Green | 0 | 0 | 6 | 85.7% |
| Independent | 0 | 2 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Lab | 46 | 0 | 0 | 92.0% |
| LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
| SNP | 24 | 0 | 0 | 96.0% |
| SSCUP | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Total: | 86 | 21 | 8 | 89.8% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by name
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote