[S2M-4864] Decision Time — 28 Sep 2006 at 17:02
This looks like the vote on S2M-4864
The description in the bulletin on 2006-09-27 is:
*S2M-4864 Roseanna Cunningham: Trident—That the Parliament believes that there is no justification for the renewal or replacement of the Trident nuclear weapons system.
The description in the bulletin on 2006-09-28 is:
S2M-4864 Trident (lodged on 26 September 2006) Mr Bruce McFee*
You can search for this motion (S2M-4864) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that motion S2M-4864, in the name of Roseanna Cunningham, on Trident, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 15 | 0 | 0 | 88.2% |
| Green | 0 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 3 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Lab | 42 | 3 | 2 | 94.0% |
| LDem | 15 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SG | 0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 0 | 23 | 0 | 92.0% |
| SSCUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 3 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Total: | 72 | 44 | 2 | 92.2% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by party
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote