[S3M-1176.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 23 Jan 2008 at 18:00
This looks like the vote on S3M-1176.1
The description in the bulletin on 2008-01-21 is:
*S3M-1176.1 Andrew Welsh on behalf of the Finance Committee: Budget (Scotland) Bill—As an amendment to motion (S3M-1176) in the name of John Swinney, insert at end "but, in so doing, recommends that the Scottish Government (a) brings forward proposals setting out how, over the period covered by the spending review, the level of police recruitment can be increased beyond that currently planned and (b) considers whether there is scope to increase the business rate reductions applying in 2008-09 beyond those stated in the Spending Review as the first stage of the acceleration of the reductions, setting out what changes will be required to the 2008-09 Budget as a result."
You can search for this motion (S3M-1176.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that amendment S3M-1176.1, in the name of Andrew Welsh, which seeks to amend motion S3M-1176, in the name of John Swinney, on the Budget (Scotland) Bill, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 16 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Green | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 0 | 0 | 46 | 100.0% |
| LDem | 0 | 0 | 16 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 47 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 65 | 1 | 62 | 100.0% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by name
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote