Planning Bill — 18 Nov 2008 at 18:56
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock voted in the minority (Not-Content).
Resolved in the negative, and amendment disagreed to accordingly.
moved Amendments Nos. 22 and 23:
Clause 209, page 121, line 40, leave out "applies only" and insert "does not apply"
Clause 209, page 121, line 46, leave out "register" and insert "be registered in the register kept"
On Question, amendments agreed to.
<[i>Amendments Nos. 24 and 25 not moved.]
Clause 215 <[i>Application]:
<[i>Amendment No. 26 not moved.]
Clause 221 <[i>Regulations and orders: general]:
moved Amendment No. 27:
Clause 221, page 130, line 26, at end insert ", and
(c) shall not be made unless, before approval by the House of Commons, a period of 60 days has elapsed, beginning with the day on which the regulations were laid.
(3) During the period of 60 days-
(a) either House of Parliament may-(i) debate, or pass a resolution relating to, the regulations, or(ii) refer the regulations to any committee for a report; and(b) the Secretary of State must respond to any such debate or resolution or to any such report of a committee before the House of Commons gives its approval to the regulations under this section."
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 27) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 128; Not-Contents, 125.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
Con | 65 (+1 tell) | 0 | 32.5% |
Crossbench | 15 | 3 | 9.4% |
Lab | 0 | 117 (+2 tell) | 54.6% |
LDem | 45 (+1 tell) | 0 | 60.5% |
UUP | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 126 | 120 | 36.2% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Boston of Faversham | Crossbench | no |
Lord Elystan-Morgan | Crossbench | no |
Lord Joffe | Crossbench | no |
Lord Patel of Bradford | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Rees of Ludlow | Crossbench | no |
Lord Wedderburn of Charlton | Crossbench | no |