[S3M-3164.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 7 Jan 2009 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S3M-3164.3
The description in the bulletin on 2009-01-07 is:
*S3M-3164.3 Rhona Brankin: National Qualifications—As an amendment to motion (S3M-3164) in the name of Fiona Hyslop, insert at end "; is therefore concerned at the continued lack of clarity over the implementation of the Curriculum for Excellence (CfE) within the new examinable framework; highlights the need for parents, teachers and other stakeholders to be involved to a far greater extent in developing the CfE and for teaching staff in particular to be given the time and investment needed to develop materials for it; believes that literacy and numeracy are central to the development of the CfE; believes that it is unacceptable that fewer than half of P7 pupils are well established in reading; calls on the Scottish Government to establish an assessment regime for basic literacy in primary schools, linked to individual programmes for pupils who have failed to attain adequate literacy skills, with the expectation that all pupils should leave primary school functionally literate, and calls for a greater show of leadership and direction from the Cabinet Secretary for Education and Lifelong Learning."
You can search for this motion (S3M-3164.3) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
There are four questions to be put as a result of today's business. The first question is, that amendment S3M-3164.3, in the name of Rhona Brankin, which seeks to amend motion S3M-3164, in the name of Fiona Hyslop, on national qualifications, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 16 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Green | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
Lab | 0 | 42 | 0 | 91.3% |
LDem | 0 | 0 | 15 | 93.8% |
SNP | 45 | 0 | 0 | 95.7% |
Total: | 63 | 42 | 16 | 94.5% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by vote
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |