[S3M-3674.3 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 12 Mar 2009 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S3M-3674.3
The description in the bulletin on 2009-03-12 is:
*S3M-3674.3 Stewart Stevenson: Aberdeen Crossrail—As an amendment to motion (S3M-3674) in the name of Alison McInnes, leave out from "which would" to end and insert "which is being tackled incrementally by the introduction of new services from Inverurie, the opening of Laurencekirk station, the re-timetabling of other services and the bringing forward of work on Kintore station; believes that this incremental approach delivers early and cost-effective benefits to rail services across Aberdeen; recognises that the introduction of additional stops increases journey times and can, in certain circumstances, reduce the viability of services overall; welcomes the real progress being made by the Scottish Government after years of inaction, and looks forward to further rail investment in the north as announced in the Strategic Transport Projects Review." Supported by: John Swinney*
You can search for this motion (S3M-3674.3) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that amendment S3M-3674.3, in the name of Stewart Stevenson, which seeks to amend motion S3M-3674, in the name of Alison McInnes, on the Aberdeen crossrail, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
All Votes Cast - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party are marked in red. Also shows which MPs were ministers at the time of this vote. You can also see every eligible MP including those who did not vote in this division.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote