[S3M-4004] Decision Time — 30 Apr 2009 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S3M-4004
The description in the bulletin on 2009-04-29 is:
*S3M-4004 John Swinney: Budget Implications for Scotland—That the Parliament expresses its deep concern at the contents of the Chancellor of the Exchequer’s Budget last week; recognises that this is a product of poor financial management of the UK economy in recent years that will leave unprecedented burdens of debt for many years to come; acknowledges the significant pressure that the reduction of planned budgets of £500 million will have on public services, and calls on the Scottish Government to bring forward budget proposals for 2010-11 that will support a sustainable economy and effective public services and include an assessment of the carbon impact of its budget. Supported by: Jim Mather*
You can search for this motion (S3M-4004) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that motion S3M-4004, in the name of John Swinney, on budget implications for Scotland, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 15 | 0 | 0 | 93.8% |
| Green | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 0 | 42 | 0 | 91.3% |
| LDem | 0 | 1 | 15 | 100.0% |
| SNP | 46 | 0 | 0 | 97.9% |
| Total: | 64 | 43 | 15 | 95.3% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by constituency
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote