[S3M-4748.1.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 2 Sep 2009 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S3M-4748.1.1
The description in the bulletin on 2009-09-02 is:
*S3M-4748.1.1 Bill Aitken: Decision on Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi—As an amendment to amendment (S3M-4748.1) in the name of Richard Baker, after second "Libya" insert "; recognises the ability of both the Scottish police and the NHS in Scotland on the basis of past performance to have supported the release of Mr Al Megrahi to an appropriate location and regrets that this was not adequately explored"
The description in the bulletin on 2009-09-07 is:
S3M-4748.1.1 Bill Aitken: Decision on Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi—As an amendment to amendment (S3M-4748.1) in the name of Richard Baker, after second "Libya" insert "; recognises the ability of both the Scottish police and the NHS in Scotland on the basis of past performance to have supported the release of Mr Al Megrahi to an appropriate location and regrets that this was not adequately explored".
You can search for this motion (S3M-4748.1.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that amendment S3M-4748.1.1, in the name of Bill Aitken, which seeks to amend amendment S3M-4748.1, in the name of Richard Baker, on the decision on Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 14 | 0 | 0 | 87.5% |
| Green | 0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 44 | 1 | 0 | 97.8% |
| LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 93.8% |
| SNP | 0 | 47 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 73 | 50 | 1 | 96.9% |
All MPs Eligible to Vote - sorted by constituency
Includes MPs who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote