[S3M-5620.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 28 Jan 2010 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S3M-5620.2
The description in the bulletin on 2010-01-28 is:
*S3M-5620.2 Jim Mather: The Scottish Newspaper Industry—As an amendment to motion (S3M-5620) in the name of Pauline McNeill, leave out from "with concern" to end and insert "that the Scottish Government is currently consulting on the future of public information notices; further notes that this consultation is being run at the request of Scottish local authorities and does not close until 12 February 2010, and acknowledges that, as part of the consultation, the Scottish Government is committed to listening to all views and, in particular, those expressed by the Scottish Parliament." Supported by: Fiona Hyslop*
You can search for this motion (S3M-5620.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that amendment S3M-5620.2, in the name of Jim Mather, which seeks to amend motion S3M-5620, in the name of Pauline McNeill, on the Scottish newspaper industry, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
All Votes Cast - sorted by name
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party are marked in red. Also shows which MPs were ministers at the time of this vote. You can also see every eligible MP including those who did not vote in this division.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote