University Tuition Fee Cap raise to £9,000 — 14 Dec 2010 at 20:16
Lord Prescott was absent
The majority of Lords voted against raising the UK's undergraduate tuition fee cap to £9,000 per year.
The majority of Lords voted against changing the motion for debate from:
- That, for the purpose of section 24 of the Higher Education Act 2004, the higher amount should be increased to £9,000, and to £4,500 in the cases described in regulation 5 of the draft regulations in Command Paper Cm 7986, and that the increase should take effect from 1 September 2012
- This House
- regrets that the Government has failed to consult adequately with parents, students, higher education bodies, employers and local authorities on raising student tuition fees and to convince many people of the fairness and sustainability of its proposals for funding higher education;
- urges the Government to undertake more public consultation on the issue, including consultation with future graduates and their families who did not contribute to the consultation over the Browne review;
- further considers that there should be an independent impact assessment on (a) the financial consequences of the proposed fees on students from both lower and middle income families, and (b) the financial consequences of the proposed fees on women, including a full assessment of the impact of the fees on equalities and fairness, and further calls on Her Majesty's Government to commission new research to analyse the probable impact on demand for university courses of fees being increased to the range of £6,000 to £9,000 per annum from students from lower and middle income families and women; and
- further considers that, prior to contemplating any increase to the basic amount specified in section 24 of the Education Act 2004, the Government should publish a White Paper on reform of higher education funding, allowing for consultation and for consideration of alternative proposals.
Command paper Cm 7986 is a draft document which became The Higher Education (Higher Amount) (England) Regulations 2010.
The £9,000 "Higher Amount" is the maximum fee an institution can charge if it has a plan in place under section 33 of the 2004 Higher Education Act. Such plans require institutions to set out how they are to promote awareness of financial and access arrangements for the course. Regulations may be introduced to require governing bodies to monitor their institutions' compliance with their plans.
Sections 30-38 of the 2004 Higher Education Act deal with plans, and their enforcement. The plans are approved and enforced in accordance with Section 34 of the Act, by the "Office for Fair Access" which calls the plans "access agreements". Access agreements can be viewed on the OfFA website.
Ministerial guidance as to the content of the plans has been issued.
In the absence of such a plan institutions are only permitted to charge the "Basic Amount". This division was followed by another vote which set the "Basic Amount" at £6,000 per year.
The £4,500 cap applies to final years and sandwich course years where there is a shorter than usual amount of attendance required at the institution.
There was a [http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2010-12-09&number=150 House of Commons vote on the same Statutory Instrument required for setting the upper limit for the university fee to £9,000 per year.
-  Section 24 of the 2004 Higher Education Act
-  Command Paper Cm 7986
-  Section 33 of the 2004 Higher Education Act - The legislation which defines the plans required to charge the higher rate of fees.
-  Tweet by Nick Hillman, Special Adviser to Universities Minister David Willetts. 11th December 2010
-  The Office for Fair Access Website
-  Ministerial Guidance to the Director of Fair Access, The head of the Office of Fair Access - Issued December 7th 2010
-  Tuition Fee Cap - Raise Basic Cap to £6,000 - House of Commons Division, 9th December 2010.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Not-Content)||Minority (Content)||Turnout|
|Con||164 (+1 tell)||0||82.9%|
|Lab||0||155 (+2 tell)||66.5%|
|LDem||58 (+1 tell)||4||76.8%|
|Lord Alton of Liverpool||Crossbench||aye|
|Lord Best||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|The Earl of Clancarty||Crossbench||aye|
|Baroness Coussins||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Eames||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Harries of Pentregarth||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Krebs||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|The Earl of Listowel||Crossbench||aye|
|Lord Low of Dalston||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Baroness Masham of Ilton||Crossbench||aye|
|Lord May of Oxford||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Baroness O'Loan||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Patel of Bradford||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Baroness Stern||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Wedderburn of Charlton||Crossbench||aye|
|Baroness Young of Hornsey||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Cotter||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Fearn||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Smith of Clifton||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Maginnis of Drumglass||UUP||no|