Mesothelioma Bill [HL] — Report — 17 Jul 2013 at 19:46

Lord Prescott voted in the minority (Content).

Amendments 5 and 6 not moved.

Amendment 7

Moved by Lord Freud

7: Clause 2, page 2, line 19, leave out “regulations made by the Secretary of State” and insert “the scheme”

Amendment 7 agreed.

Clause 3 : Eligible dependants

Amendment 8 not moved.

Amendment 9

Moved by Lord Freud

9: Clause 3, page 2, line 47, leave out “regulations made by the Secretary of State” and insert “the scheme”

Amendment 9 agreed.

Clause 3 agreed.

Clause 4 : Payments

Amendment 10

Moved by Lord Freud

10: Clause 4, page 3, line 4, leave out “regulations made by the Secretary of State” and insert “the scheme”

Amendment 10 agreed.

Amendment 11

Moved by Lord McKenzie of Luton

11: Clause 4, page 3, line 4, at end insert “but shall be not less than 100% of the average damages recovered by claimants in mesothelioma cases”

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Bishop0 14.2%
Con99 (+1 tell) 046.5%
Crossbench9 1110.5%
DUP0 250.0%
Independent Labour0 1100.0%
Lab0 96 (+2 tell)44.3%
LDem41 (+1 tell) 045.2%
Other0 133.3%
PC0 150.0%
UUP2 0100.0%
Total:151 11335.5%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Aberdare Crossbench (front bench)no
Viscount Colville of CulrossCrossbenchno
Viscount Craigavon Crossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Deech Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Greenway Crossbenchno
Lord Jay of EwelmeCrossbenchno
Lord Pannick Crossbenchno
Lord Trees Crossbenchno
Lord Williamson of HortonCrossbenchno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

TWe're working on updating the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive