Transparency of Lobbying, Non-Party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Bill — Timetable motion — 8 Oct 2013 at 17:44
Edward Garnier MP, Harborough did not vote.
The majority of MPs voted in favour of a proposed timetable for the consideration of the Transparency of Lobbying, Non-Party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Bill.
It is not possible to ascribe a position on the substance of the Bill from an MP's vote in this division.
Both MPs who support and those who oppose the substance of the Bill might think it worthy of more time for debate and so oppose the proposed timetable.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||265 (+2 tell)||2||0||88.2%|
|Lab||0||227 (+2 tell)||0||88.8%|
|Christopher Chope||Christchurch||Con (front bench)||no|