Transparency of Lobbying, Non-Party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Bill — Committee (2nd Day) — 15 Jan 2014 at 21:37
Lord Shipley voted in the minority (Content).
Amendment 45A not moved.
Clause 27: Changes to existing limits
Moved by Lord Wallace of Tankerness
46: Clause 27, page 14, line 42, leave out subsection (1) and insert-
“(1) Section 94 of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (limits on controlled expenditure by third parties) is amended in accordance with subsections (1A) to (1E).
“(1A) In subsection (3), for paragraph (a) (but not the “and” after it) substitute-
“(a) during a regulated period-
(i) any controlled expenditure is incurred in a part of the United Kingdom by or on behalf of a third party in excess of the limit for that part of the United Kingdom mentioned in subsection (5), or
(ii) any controlled expenditure is incurred in a particular parliamentary constituency by or on behalf of a third party in excess of the limit mentioned in subsection (5ZA),”.
(1B) In subsection (5)-
(a) in the opening words, for “(3)” substitute “(3)(a)(i)”;
(b) in paragraph (a), for “£10,000” substitute “£20,000”;
(c) in paragraph (b), for “£5,000” substitute “£10,000.”
(1C) After subsection (5) insert-
“(5ZA) The limit referred to in subsection (3)(a)(ii) is 0.05% of the total of the maximum campaign expenditure limits in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.”
(1D) In subsection (5A) for “(5)” substitute “(5ZA)”.
(1E) In subsection (10), omit the “and” at the end of paragraph (c) and after paragraph (d) insert-
“(e) the “maximum campaign expenditure limit” in a part of the United Kingdom is the limit imposed by paragraph 3 of Schedule 9 in relation to campaign expenditure incurred in the relevant period (within the meaning of that paragraph) by or on behalf of a registered party which contests all the constituencies in that part (and to which sub-paragraph (6) of that paragraph does not apply).””
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Not-Content)||Minority (Content)||Turnout|
|Con||97 (+1 tell)||1 (+1 tell)||43.7%|
|LDem||31 (+1 tell)||12 (+1 tell)||43.7%|
|Lord Hamilton of Epsom||Con (front bench)||tellaye|
|Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Campbell-Savours||Lab (minister)||aye|
|Baroness Corston||Lab (minister)||aye|
|Lord Howarth of Newport||Lab||aye|
|Lord Soley||Lab (minister)||aye|
|Baroness Taylor of Bolton||Lab (minister)||aye|
|Lord Allan of Hallam||LDem||aye|
|Baroness Barker||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Clement-Jones||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Cotter||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Dholakia||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Phillips of Sudbury||LDem||aye|
|Lord Roper||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Shipley||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Shutt of Greetland||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Taylor of Goss Moor||LDem||aye|
|Baroness Williams of Crosby||LDem||aye|