Consumer Rights Bill — Secondary Ticketing Platforms — Require Publication of Seller ID and Full Ticket Details — 12 Jan 2015 at 19:15
Patrick McLoughlin MP, Derbyshire Dales did not vote.
The majority of MPs voted against requiring ticket reselling websites to identify ticket sellers and carry full details of tickets including face value, seat numbers and more.
The motion passed by the majority of MPs in this vote was:
- That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 12.
Lords amendment 12 sought to introduce a new clause to the bill titled 'Secondary ticketing platforms' subclause (1) of which stated:
- Secondary ticketing operators must, on the website on which tickets are offered for sale or transfer, provide information concerning the sellers of tickets so that sellers may be easily identified.
The clause also required the publication of "all relevant information" relating to the ticket, including its face value and details of the seat (if any) the ticket relates to.
-  Parliament's webpage on the Consumer Rights Bill
-  Consumer Rights Bill as brought from the Commons (version to which amendments relate)
-  Lords amendments to the Consumer Rights Bill
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||244 (+1 tell)||4||1||82.5%|
|Lab||0||187 (+2 tell)||0||73.3%|
|LDem||42 (+1 tell)||0||0||76.8%|
|Stephen Barclay||North East Cambridgeshire||Con||no|
|Jason McCartney||Colne Valley||Con (front bench)||no|
|Andrew Percy||Brigg and Goole||Con (front bench)||no|
|Andrew Mitchell||Sutton Coldfield||Con||both|