Housing and Planning Bill — Commons Reasons and Amendments — 10 May 2016 at 18:00
Moved by Baroness Williams of Trafford
10C: Because it would undermine the delivery of starter homes.
Moved by Lord Kerslake
Moved by Baroness Williams of Trafford
47D: Because they would alter the financial arrangements made by the Commons, and the Commons do not offer any further Reason, trusting that this Reason may be deemed sufficient.
Moved by Lord Kerslake
47E: Clause 72, page 31, line 42, at end insert-“( ) The amount of any reduction agreed under subsection (1) must be sufficient to fund the provision of at least one new affordable home outside Greater London, and at least two new affordable homes in Greater London, for each old dwelling.( ) Where the local housing authority can demonstrate, whether by reference to its local housing plan or otherwise, that there is a particular need in its area for social rented housing, the Secretary of State, as part of any agreement under subsection (1), must consider any application from the authority to fund the provision of a new dwelling to be let as social housing, in respect of each old dwelling.””
Ayes 256, Noes 245.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 202 (+2 tell) | 80.0% |
Crossbench | 12 (+2 tell) | 33 | 26.7% |
DUP | 0 | 2 | 50.0% |
Green | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent Liberal Democrat | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Judge | 0 | 2 | 13.3% |
Lab | 150 | 0 | 68.8% |
LDem | 83 | 0 | 76.1% |
Non-affiliated | 5 | 2 | 23.3% |
PC | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
UUP | 0 | 2 | 100.0% |
Total: | 254 | 243 | 61.5% |
All lords Eligible to Vote - sorted by vote
Includes lords who were absent (or abstained) from this vote.