Finance Bill — New Clause 1 — Non-Domiciled Individuals — Protection of Overseas Trusts — 31 Oct 2017 at 14:45

John Baron MP, Basildon and Billericay voted not to undertake a review of the effects of protections for overseas trusts in relation to new provisions on the tax treatment of non-domiciled individuals.

The majority of MPs voted not to undertake a review of the effects of protections for overseas trusts in relation to new provisions on the tax treatment of non-domiciled individuals.

MPs were considering the Finance Bill[1].

The proposed new clause rejected in this vote was titled: Deemed domicile: review of protection of overseas trusts and stated:

  • ‘(1) Within fifteen months of the passing of this Act, the Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs shall complete a review about the operation of the provisions for the protection of overseas trusts in relation to deemed domicile.
  • (2) The review shall in particular consider—
  • (a) the effects of those provisions on the Exchequer,
  • (b) the behavioural effects of those provisions, and
  • (c) the effects on the matters specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) if those provisions were repealed.
  • (3) For the purposes of this section, “the provisions for the protection of overseas trusts” means the provisions inserted 18 to 38 and 40 of Schedule 8 to this Act.
  • (4) The Chancellor of the Exchequer shall lay a report of the review under this section before the House of Commons within three months of its completion.’

The rejected new clause was accompanied by the following explanatory note:

  • This new clause requires a review to be undertaken of the effects of the provisions for protecting overseas trusts from the new provisions in relation to deemed domicile.

==

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Con301 (+2 tell) 0095.6%
DUP8 0080.0%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent0 1050.0%
Lab0 230 (+2 tell)088.9%
LDem0 10083.3%
PC0 40100.0%
SNP0 33094.3%
Total:309 279092.2%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

TWe're working on updating the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive