Domestic Abuse Bill — Clause 55 — Support Provided by Local Authorities to Victims of Domestic Abuse — Child Contact Centre Accreditation — 15 Apr 2021 at 15:45

The majority of MPs voted not to require facilities and organisations enabling children to meet the parents they don't live with to be accredited in accordance with national standards in relation to safeguarding and preventing domestic abuse.

MPs were considering the Domestic Abuse Bill.[1][2]

The motion supported by a majority of MPs in this vote was:

  • That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 9

Lords amendment 9[3] stated:

  • Page 35, line 19, at end insert—
  • “( ) ensure all child contact centres and organisations that offer child contact services are accredited in accordance with national standards in relation to safeguarding and preventing domestic abuse as specified in regulations made by the Secretary of State.”

The rejected amendment would have impacted clause 55 of the Bill[4] titled Support provided by local authorities to victims of domestic abuse and would have added an additional duty for relevant local councils.

The explanatory notes to the Lords amendments[5] stated :

  • "Lords Amendment 9 would provide that each local authority in England must ensure that all child contact centres and organisations that offer child contact services are accredited in accordance with national standards in relation to safeguarding and preventing domestic abuse. The standards would be set by regulations made by the Secretary of State."

Child contact centres are not defined in the Bill or amendment however the term is used to describe facilities for children to meet the parents they don't live with.[6]

--

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)BothTurnout
Alliance0 10100.0%
Con350 (+2 tell) 2097.3%
DUP0 80100.0%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent0 40100.0%
Lab0 194 (+2 tell)098.5%
LDem0 110100.0%
Total:350 221097.8%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
Robert HalfonHarlowCon (front bench)no
Jason McCartneyColne ValleyConno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive