Fire Safety Bill — Commons Reason — Motion A1 (as an amendment to Motion A) — 27 Apr 2021 at 20:15

Moved by Lord Kennedy of Southwark

4L: After Clause 2, insert the following new Clause-“Legislative proposals relating to prohibition on passing remediation costs on to leaseholders and tenants(1) The owner of a building may not pass the costs of any remedial work attributable to the provisions of this Act on to leaseholders or tenants of that building.(2) Subsection (1) has effect only until a statutory scheme is in operation which ensures that leaseholders and tenants of dwellings do not have to pay for remedial work attributable to the provisions of this Act.(3) Within 90 days of the passing of this Act, the Secretary of State must publish draft legislation to ensure that leaseholders and tenants of dwellings do not have to pay the costs of any remedial work attributable to the provisions of this Act, and must also publish a statement on a proposed timetable for the passage of the draft legislation.(4) Within 120 days of the passing of this Act, the Secretary of State must publish a statement confirming whether the draft legislation mentioned in subsection (3) has progressed.””

Ayes 329, Noes 247.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop9 034.6%
Con1 22886.1%
Crossbench70 1245.6%
DUP5 0100.0%
Green2 0100.0%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Judge3 027.3%
Lab142 077.2%
LDem77 089.5%
Non-affiliated18 642.1%
PC1 0100.0%
UUP0 150.0%
Total:329 24770.2%

Rebel Voters - sorted by vote

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Framlingham Conaye
Lord Bhatia Non-affiliatedno
Lord Botham Crossbenchno
Viscount Brookeborough Crossbenchno
Lord Cameron of DillingtonCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Carrington Crossbenchno
Viscount Colville of CulrossCrossbench (front bench)no
Viscount Craigavon Crossbenchno
The Earl of DevonCrossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Falkner of MargravineCrossbenchno
Lord Faulks Non-affiliated (front bench)no
Lord Hogan-Howe Crossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Hogg Crossbenchno
Lord Kalms Non-affiliatedno
Lord Lupton Non-affiliatedno
Lord Moore of EtchinghamNon-affiliatedno
Lord Powell of BayswaterCrossbenchno
Lord Tyrie Non-affiliated (front bench)no
The Duke of WellingtonCrossbenchno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive